Haluk Yaka1, Veysel Başbuğ2, Alper Aziz Tekin3, Mustafa Özer4

1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Türkiye
2Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Private Nevşehir Versa Hospital, Nevşehir, Türkiye
3Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ceylanpınar State Hospital, Şanlıurfa, Türkiye
4Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye

Keywords: Elbow, extensor carpi radialis brevis, lateral epicondylitis, pain, vitamin D.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to examine the relationship between low vitamin D levels and lateral epicondylitis (LE).

Patients and methods: Between January 2016 and January 2018, a total of 40 patients (17 males, 23 females; mean age: 38.6±10.7 years; range, 18 to 59 years) diagnosed with LE were included as the study group, while 66 patients (33 males, 33 females; mean age: 33.6±12.5 years; range, 18 to 58 years) who did not have any elbow complaints and met the study criteria were included as the control group. Both groups were compared in terms of vitamin D levels, of which levels of >30 ng/mL were considered normal, levels between 20-30 ng/mL were accepted as vitamin D insufficiency, and levels <20 ng/mL were categorized as vitamin D deficiency.

Results: Vitamin D levels of the LE group were significantly lower than the control group (p<0.001). The mean vitamin D level was 16.47±8.22 (range, 8.32 to 39.55) ng/mL in the LE group, and 23.64±8.4 (range, 11.6 to 49) ng/mL in the control group. While 31 of the patients (77.5%) diagnosed with LE had vitamin D deficiency, four (10%) had vitamin D insufficiency, and five (12.5%) had normal vitamin D levels. In the control group, 29 (43.9%) patients had vitamin D deficiency, 20 (30.3%) had vitamin D insufficiency, and 17 (25.8%) had normal vitamin D levels.

Conclusion: Although the etiology of LE has not been fully understood yet, vitamin D levels were significantly lower in LE patients in our study. This finding supports that low vitamin D may be one of the factors in the etiology of LE.

Introduction

Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain.[1] Lateral epicondylitis is common in the general population with a prevalence of 1 to 3%, and the highest incidence is between 40 and 50 years of age.[2,3]

The etiology of LE is not fully understood and appears to be independent of sex or ethnicity.[1,4] It is assumed that the main factors in the etiology are tenocyte proliferation caused by repetitive overuse and structurally abnormal collagen production. Several studies have shown that it is not a classical inflammatory process, but several cytokines may play a role in the etiology.[5]

In LE, the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) tendon is involved in more than 95% of all cases.[6] Nimura et al.,[7] in their study on 23 cadavers, showed that the ECRB tendon was in direct contact with the joint capsule above the humeroradial joint level and, therefore, the joint loads were transferred to the ECRB tendon. In their study, Ando et al.[8] suggested that the attachment area of the ERCB tendon on the lateral humeral epicondyle was 13 times smaller than the attachment area of the extensor carpi radialis longus (ECRL) tendon and, therefore, the ECRB tendon was more fragile. Bunata et al.,[9] on the other hand, associated LE with friction between the ECRB tendon and the capitellum during elbow flexion and extension.

It is well known that vitamin D is vital for maintaining a balanced bone turnover and a healthy bone microenvironment. Previous studies have shown that untreated vitamin D deficiency results in well-known diseases such as osteoporosis, rickets, and osteomalacia and has a series of other effects on bones. Low levels of vitamin D in particular have been associated with metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases, certain types of cancer and infectious diseases, and exacerbation of many orthopedic disease patterns.[10-12]

Min et al.[13] performed an experimental study on tenocytes, assuming that vitamin D might have a protective effect on tendons, as well as on bones and muscles. Their study demonstrated that there was a vitamin D receptor on tenocytes and that when tenocytes suppressed by dexamethasone were exposed to vitamin D, type I collagen gene expression in tenocytes returned to normal.

Many studies on the etiology of LE focus on ECRB and elbow anatomy, while studies on low vitamin D levels mostly focus on bone pathologies and calcium metabolism.[6,7,10,11] Studies investigating the relationship between vitamin D and tendinopathy are not only limited in number, but also inconsistent.[13-15] To the best of our knowledge, there is no study showing the relationship between LE and low vitamin D levels. In the present study, we hypothesized that there might be a relationship between LE and low vitamin D levels. We, therefore, aimed to examine the relationship between vitamin D levels and LE.

Patients and Methods

This single-center, retrospective study was conducted at Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Medicine Faculty, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology between January 2016 and January 2018. Among 147 patients with elbow pain who applied to our clinic, 40 (17 males, 23 females; mean age: 38.6±10.7 years; range, 18 to 59 years) who met the inclusion criteria and were diagnosed with LE were screened. Exclusion criteria were trauma history, previous upper extremity surgery, elbow arthrosis, metabolic bone diseases, endocrinological diseases affecting calcium-parathormone metabolism, infectious conditions, presence of neoplasia, rheumatological diseases, and kidney diseases. In addition, among 287 patients who were admitted to our clinic for minor soft tissue traumas during the same period and checked for vitamin D levels, 66 (33 males, 33 females; mean age: 33.6±12.5 years; range, 18 to 58 years) with no upper extremity musculoskeletal complaints, no history of fractures or dislocations, and no muscle or tendon damage were included as the control group. Patients with acute minor lower extremity trauma were included to compose the control group from patients without chronic inflammatory conditions, non-inflammatory and degenerative orthopedic diseases, bone, tendon, or ligament injuries, long-term immobilizations, complaints about tendinitis in the region, continuous drug use due to other systematic chronic diseases, and using vitamin D replacement therapy for any reason.

Lateral epicondylitis was diagnosed based on medical history and physical examination. With lateral elbow pain, imaging studies are rarely needed at the initial examination. Thus, the diagnosis of LE was based on symptoms and physical examination alone. However, imaging techniques can rule out other abnormalities in the lateral elbow compartment, particularly if symptoms persist despite optimal conservative treatment.[1] On examination, the point of maximum tenderness is usually above the lateral epicondyle, sometimes 1 to 2 cm distal to the lateral epicondyle. Pain and tension in the tendon may occur on palpation of the ECRB tendon. With strong wrist extension, particularly when the elbow is extended and the forearm pronated, the pain would increase or recur. Resistive extension of the middle finger with the elbow extended is particularly painful due to the increased stress applied to the tendon, further supporting this diagnosis. Furthermore, there should be no numbness or tingling.[16]

There is no universal classification of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency. In our study, vitamin D levels >30 ng/mL were considered normal, 20-30 ng/mL levels were accepted as vitamin D insufficiency, and <20 ng/mL as vitamin D deficiency. These levels are commonly used threshold levels.[17]

Statistical analysis

The post-hoc power calculations were performed using the G*Power version 3.1.9.4 software (Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany).

Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS version 22.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive data were presented in mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (min-max) or number and frequency. The Mann-Whitney U and chi-square tests were used to compare independent variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic data of the patients are summarized in Table I. When the two groups were compared in terms of age and sex, there was no significant difference (p=0.35 and p=0.51, respectively).

When the LE and control group were compared in vitamin D, patients with LE had significantly lower levels than the control group (p<0.001). The mean vitamin D level was 16.47±8.22 (range, 8.32 to 39.55) ng/mL in the vitamin D deficiency group and 23.64±8.4 (range, 11.6 to 49) ng/mL in the control group. While 31 of the patients (77.5%) diagnosed with LE had vitamin D deficiency, four (10%) had vitamin D insufficiency, and five (12.5%) had normal vitamin D levels. In the control group, 29 (43.9%) patients had vitamin D deficiency, 20 (30.3%) had vitamin D insufficiency, while 17 patients (25.8%) had normal vitamin D levels (Table II).

Discussion

The most important finding of this study is that patients with LE had significantly lower vitamin D levels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature from this aspect.[18]

While normal tendon tissue consists of 70% water, more than 85% of dry weight consists of type I collagen.[19,20] Since type I collagen is the main component of the tendon extracellular matrix (ECM), tendon tissue’s structural and mechanical properties are largely dependent on the amount and quality of type I collagen.[19] Tenoblasts are fibroblasts of the tendon tissue that actively synthesize ECM components, particularly type I collagen,[21] while tenocytes are cells that maintain the integrity of ECM and ECM-related proteins by regulating type I collagen.[19] Min et al.[13] investigated the effects of vitamin D on tenocytes in their experimental histological study on human tenocytes. In their study, they administrated dexamethasone to damage human tenocytes and examined the levels of tendon markers tenomodulin, tenascin, type I collagen, and type III collagen. Then, the tenocytes were exposed to vitamin D and 1-alpha hydroxylase to investigate vitamin D receptors. They showed that tenomodulin, tenascin, and type I and type III collagen gene expression decreased in tenocytes suppressed by dexamethasone, and the expression of tenomodulin and type I collagen returned to normal when exposed to vitamin D. Furthermore, they showed that reactive oxygen species produced by dexamethasone decreased with vitamin D and that tenocytes had 1-alpha hydroxylase and vitamin D receptors and they interacted with vitamin D. In conclusion, Min et al.,[13] in their experimental study on tenocyte cell cultures, reported that vitamin D had beneficial effects on tendons in addition to bones and muscles. In this context, significantly low levels of vitamin D in patients with LE may suggest that there may be a relationship between LE and decreased tendon protective effects of vitamin D.

Chen et al.[22] showed that the collagen-1 gene was downregulated in a mechanically stretched tendon through tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation. In addition, Thankam et al.[19] showed an increased synthesis of metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, MMP-8, MMP-13, and gelatinases in damaged rotator cuff tendons and suggested that MMP-9 in particular caused rotator cuff tendinopathy by reducing the type I collagen/type III collagen ratio. In line with these studies, the importance of type I collagen reduction in the tendon in the development of tendinitis is clear. The effect of vitamin D on the production and amount of type I collagen in the tendon has been previously shown.[13] However, the etiology of LE cannot be fully explained by biomechanical factors such as the ECRB tendon being longer than other tendons in the lateral compartment of the elbow, the smaller footprint on the lateral humeral epicondyle than the ECRL, and the friction between the ECRB tendon and the capitellum during flexion and extension. Therefore, we believe that vitamin D deficiency alone cannot explain the etiology of LE. In addition to the biomechanical disadvantages of ECRB, we consider that vitamin D deficiency may also be a predictive factor for tendinitis. The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and tendinitis has been shown. We believe that this relationship is not specific to LE we examined in our study but may be related to tendinitis in other parts of the musculoskeletal system. In addition, the extent of the contribution of anatomic variations of the ECRB tendon and low levels of vitamin D to LE is unknown, and we consider that this situation would be also valid in other musculoskeletal system regions. Therefore, tendinitis of other musculoskeletal regions should be evaluated together with their biomechanical properties. The presence of patients with LE and normal vitamin D levels in our study supports that low levels of vitamin D are not the only or the biggest factor in the etiology of tendinitis, and that many factors such as biomechanical, anatomical, and occupational components are involved in the etiology. We believe that future studies with patients with tendinitis in other parts of the musculoskeletal system or patients with more than one tendinitis would be helpful to further clarify the relationship between vitamin D and tendinitis.

Nonetheless, this study has some limitations. First, the study has a retrospective design, although the data were collected prospectively. Second, although the exclusion criteria were kept broad, the duration of the symptoms before the diagnosis of LE, and the duration of the symptoms that regressed after conservative treatment were unknown. The lack of long-term follow-up of patients with normal vitamin D levels and LE and the lack of information about the course of LE can be mentioned as further limitations. Anatomic factors contribute significantly to the etiology of LE, which has a complex pathophysiology. Although we did not include patients with a history of previous surgery and trauma, it is possible that patients cannot remember traumas. Therefore, this may be considered as another limitation. In the future, the place and role of vitamin D in the management of LE can be investigated by studying whether vitamin D replacement therapy given in addition to conservative treatment is superior to conservative treatment alone.

In conclusion, although the etiology of LE has not yet been fully understood, in our study, vitamin D levels were significantly lower in patients with LE. This study supports that low vitamin D may be one of the factors in the etiology of lateral epicondylitis.

Citation: Yaka H, Başbuğ V, Tekin AZ, Özer M. Evaluation of the relationship between lateral epicondylitis and vitamin D. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022;33(2):414-418.

Ethics Committee Approval

Ethical approval was obtained from Necmettin Erbakan University Ethical Committee (2022/3688). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Author Contributions

Idea, concept: M.Ö., H.Y., V.B.; Data collection: H.Y., V.B., A.A.T.; Analysis: M.Ö., H.Y. A.A.T.; Control and critical review: M.Ö. H.Y.; Writing the article: M.Ö., H.Y., V.B., A.A.T.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

References

  1. Keijsers R, de Vos RJ, Kuijer PPF, van den Bekerom MP, van der Woude HJ, Eygendaal D. Tennis elbow. Shoulder Elbow 2019;11:384-92.
  2. Bot SD, van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM, Dekker J. Course and prognosis of elbow complaints: A cohort study in general practice. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1331-6.
  3. Pluim BM, Fuller CW, Batt ME, Chase L, Hainline B, Miller S, et al. Consensus statement on epidemiological studies of medical conditions in tennis, April 2009. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:893-7.
  4. Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, Heliövaara M. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: A population study. Am J Epidemiol 2006;164:1065-74.
  5. Pitzer ME, Seidenberg PH, Bader DA. Elbow tendinopathy. Med Clin North Am 2014;98:833-49.
  6. Verhaar JA. Tennis elbow. Anatomical, epidemiological and therapeutic aspects. Int Orthop 1994;18:263-7.
  7. Nimura A, Fujishiro H, Wakabayashi Y, Imatani J, Sugaya H, Akita K. Joint capsule attachment to the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin: An anatomical study with possible implications regarding the etiology of lateral epicondylitis. J Hand Surg Am 2014;39:219-25.
  8. Ando R, Arai T, Beppu M, Hirata K, Takagi M. Anatomical study of arthroscopic surgery for lateral epicondylitis. Hand Surg 2008;13:85-91.
  9. Bunata RE, Brown DS, Capelo R. Anatomic factors related to the cause of tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89:1955-63.
  10. Horas K, Fraissler L, Maier G, Jakob F, Seefried L, Konrads C, et al. High prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with bone marrow edema syndrome of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38:760-6.
  11. Korompilias AV, Karantanas AH, Lykissas MG, Beris AE. Bone marrow edema syndrome. Skeletal Radiol 2009;38:425-36.
  12. Wacker M, Holick MF. Sunlight and vitamin D: A global perspective for health. Dermatoendocrinol 2013;5:51-108.
  13. Min K, Lee JM, Kim MJ, Jung SY, Kim KS, Lee S, et al. Restoration of cellular proliferation and characteristics of human tenocytes by vitamin D. J Orthop Res 2019;37:2241-8.
  14. Oh JH, Kim SH, Kim JH, Shin YH, Yoon JP, Oh CH. The level of vitamin D in the serum correlates with fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91:1587-93.
  15. Ryu KJ, Kim BH, Lee Y, Dan J, Kim JH. Low serum vitamin D is not correlated with the severity of a rotator cuff tear or retear after arthroscopic repair. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:1743-50.
  16. Buchanan BK, Varacallo M. Tennis elbow (Lateral Epicondylitis). In: Stat Pearls. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2019.
  17. Oehler N, Mussawy H, Schmidt T, Rolvien T, Barvencik F. Identification of vitamin D and other bone metabolism parameters as risk factors for primary bone marrow oedema syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:451.
  18. Atik OŞ. What are the expectations of an editor from a scientific article? Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:597-8.
  19. Thankam FG, Dilisio MF, Gross RM, Agrawal DK. Collagen I: A kingpin for rotator cuff tendon pathology. Am J Transl Res 2018;10:3291-309.
  20. Thankam FG, Dilisio MF, Agrawal DK. Immunobiological factors aggravating the fatty infiltration on tendons and muscles in rotator cuff lesions. Mol Cell Biochem 2016;417:17-33.
  21. Quigley AS, Bancelin S, Deska-Gauthier D, Légaré F, Kreplak L, Veres SP. In tendons, differing physiological requirements lead to functionally distinct nanostructures. Sci Rep 2018;8:4409.
  22. Chen K, Li P, Zhao H, Yan X, Ma Y. Effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor on stress-shielded tendons. Orthopedics 2017;40:49-55.